切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 147 -152. doi: 10.3877/cma. j. issn.1674-0807.2012.02.004

论著

超声BI-RADS 3 级乳腺不可扪及病变的微创活组织检查
吴玲1, 王颀1,(), 连臻强1, 张安秦1, 李文萍1, 马小燕2, 郜红艺3   
  1. 1.510010 广州,广州医学院附属广东省妇儿医院乳腺病中心
    2.510010 广州,广州医学院附属广东省妇儿医院超声科
    3.510010 广州,广州医学院附属广东省妇儿医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-18 出版日期:2012-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王颀
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金资助项目(No.A2006095)

Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for BI-RADS grade 3 nonpalpable breast lesions

Ling WU1, Qi WANG1,(), Zhen-qiang LIAN1, An-qin ZHANG1, Wen-ping LI1, Xiaoyan MA1, Hong-yi GAO1   

  1. 1.Breast Disease Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510010, China
  • Received:2012-01-18 Published:2012-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qi WANG
引用本文:

吴玲, 王颀, 连臻强, 张安秦, 李文萍, 马小燕, 郜红艺. 超声BI-RADS 3 级乳腺不可扪及病变的微创活组织检查[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2012, 06(02): 147-152.

Ling WU, Qi WANG, Zhen-qiang LIAN, An-qin ZHANG, Wen-ping LI, Xiaoyan MA, Hong-yi GAO. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for BI-RADS grade 3 nonpalpable breast lesions[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2012, 06(02): 147-152.

目的

探讨超声检查BI-RADS 3 级的乳腺不可扪及病变(nonpalpable breast lesion, NPBL)微创活组织检查(活检)的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2007 年1月至2010 年12 月在本院接受微创活检、超声BI-RADS 3 级的542 例NPBL 病例的临床、影像及病理资料,采用卡方检验比较即时活检组(首次超声诊断后3 个月之内活检)与随访活检组(随访6 个月后活检)发现恶性病变的概率以及两组恶性肿瘤情况的差异。

结果

全组542 例病例,病理确诊恶性病变5 例,总体恶性率为0.92%(5/542);50 ~59 岁患者的恶性率为9.68%(3/31),明显高于其他年龄组(20 ~29 岁组0,30 ~39 岁组0.40%,40 ~49 岁组0.57%,60 ~71 岁组0)。 即时活检组中恶性病变4例,恶性率为0.91%(4/435);随访活检组中恶性病变1 例,恶性率为0.93%(1/107),两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),且两组发现的恶性肿瘤的病灶大小,TNM 分期相似。

结论

超声检查BI-RADS 3 级的NPBL 恶性率低,随访活检是安全的。 但对于年龄50 岁及以上,超声评估为BI-RADS 3 级的患者需提高警惕,建议积极进行活检。

Objective

To investigate the clinical significance of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for BI-RADS grade 3 nonpalpable breast lesion (NPBL).

Methods

The clinical, imaging and histopathologic data of 542 cases of NPBL classified as grade 3 in BI-RADS and undergoing vacuum-assisted ultrasound-guided biopsy in our hospital from January 2007 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (biopsy within 3 months after first ultrasonic diagnosis) and group B (biopsy after 6-month follow-up). The malignant rates and tumor stage were compared between the two groups.

Results

In all 542 patients, 5 were proved to be malignant (0.92%). The malignant rate in the age group of 50-59 years was 9.68%(3/31), which was significantly higher than that in other age groups (20-29 years, 0; 30-39 years, 0.40%;40-49 years,0.57%;60-71 years,0). Four patients presented malignant lesion (0.91%) in group A,1 patient (0.93%) in group B, and no significant difference was showed between the two groups(P>0.05). Malignant cases in two groups showed similar tumor size and TNM stage.

Conclusions

NPBL of BI-RADS grade 3 has low malignant rate and biopsy in follow-up is safe for those patients. However, more attention should be paid for the patients ≥50 years with BI-RADS grade 3 NPBL and clinical biopsy is recommended.

表1 BI-RADS 3 级的NPBL 不同年龄组的病理结果
图1 2 例恶性病例术前超声图 a:50 岁患者,超声示10.6 mm (横径)×8.5 mm (纵径)低回声占位,BI-RADS 3 级,病理检查示浸润性导管癌;b:55 岁患者,超声示10.87 mm(横径)×4.82 mm(纵径)低回声占位,BI-RADS 3 级,病理结果示浸润性导管癌。
图2 1 例乳腺导管内癌病理图(HE 染色 ×100) 导管腔内可见异型增生上皮细胞,形态、大小相对一致,细胞核有明显异型,中央区见少许坏死,导管周围间质反应性增生伴淋巴细胞浸润。
表2 5 例恶性病例的临床资料
[1]
Mariotti C, Feliciotti F, Baldarelli M, et al. Digital stereotactic biopsies for nonpalpable breast lesion [J]. Surg Endosc,2003,17(6):911-917.
[2]
American College of Radiology. BI-RADS-US, American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Atlas (BI-RADS Atlas). Reston,2003:77-79.
[3]
Meloni GB,Dessole S,Becchere MP,et al. Ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum biopsy for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions [J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2001,18(5):520-524.
[4]
Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, et al. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2005,184(4):1260-1265.
[5]
Heinig J,Witteler R,Schmitz R,et al. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BIRADS [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2008,32(4):573-578.
[6]
Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen SS, et al. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management follow-up and outcome [J]. Radiology,2008,248(3):773-781.
[7]
Costantini M, Belli P, Ierardi C, et al. Solid breast mass characterization: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification [J]. Radiol Med,2007,112(6):877-894.
[8]
万舰,王永南,王颀,等.乳腺影像报告与数据系统在超声检查可扪及乳腺肿块中的诊断价值[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志:电子版,2010,4(4):381-388.
[9]
Baum JK, Hanna LG, Acharyya S, et al. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial [J]. Radiology,2011,260(1):61-67.
[10]
Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, et al. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? [J]. Radiology,2007,244(1):87-93.
[11]
Yucesoy C, Oktay NA, Ozturk E, et al. Pathologic assessment of non-palpable probably benign breast masses at sonography: can instant intervention be avoided and is follow-up adequate? [J]. JBR-BTR,2010,93(5):242-246.
[12]
Moon HJ, Kim MJ,Kwak JY,et al. Malignant lesions initially categorized as probably benign breast lesions:retrospective review of ultrasonographic,clinical and pathologic characteristics [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol,2010,36(4):551-559.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[9] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[10] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[13] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[14] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要